‘Doctors, Conscience and Abortion Law and Practice’ Workshop, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK, 29 June 2017

On Thursday 29th June I attended a conference at the University of Kent entitled ‘Doctors, Conscience and Abortion Law and Practice’ organised by Dr Ellie Lee and Professor Sally Sheldon as a collaboration between the Centre for the Interdisciplinary Study of Reproduction (CISoR), the Centre for Parenting Culture Studies (CPCS) and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (bpas). This conference was part of a series of events for the 50th Anniversary of the 1967 Abortion Act and aimed to promote critical reflection on this legislation. There were four main sections to the day: ‘Doctors and the Abortion Act 1967,’ ‘Abortion Providers: Doctors Who Do’, ‘Conscientious Objection: Doctors Who Don’t’ and finally closing remarks from Ann Furedi (bpas Chief Executive).

Overall this conference was extremely interesting with scholars from around the world giving fascinating talks on the issue of conscience. One of the most memorable comments of the day was made by Professor Malcolm Potts (University of California at Berkeley) who said the abortion procedure is the only one in America where “the surgeon is more likely to die than the patient”. This comment was striking for me as it really drew attention to the fantastic, yet dangerous jobs medical professionals across the globe do in providing safe abortions to women. A further interesting point raised at this conference was regarding the conscientious objection clause and the current debate surrounding the position of abortion in medicine. There were many different opinions on the conscientious objection clause of the 1967 Abortion Act at the conference. Some people attending the conference believed that abortion should be considered a routine aspect of obstetrics and gynaecology, and if any doctor conscientiously objects to abortion then they should specialise in a different field of medicine. This is widely linked to debates on the position of abortion within medicine in Britain and is definitely a discussion that needs to continue.

Finally, I would like to highlight the ‘My Abortion Experience’ project led by Dr Lesley Hoggart. During the conference we were shown several films of young women describing their experience of abortion. The stories these young women told were inspirational and showed the importance of the work that medical professionals who are involved in the provision of abortion do on a daily basis. There is an upcoming 2-day conference in London as part of this series on 24–25 October 2017 entitled ‘The Abortion Act 1967: A Promise Fulfilled?’, which aims to address a range of important socio-legal, historical, political and clinical practice-based questions, focusing on the hopes and strategies of the broad coalition (made up of disparate constituencies) in favour of liberalising change and the extent to which they have been realised.

Hannah Pereira

ESRC PhD Candidate in Social Policy, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK; hp273@kent.ac.uk

 

Statement from the Isle of Man Government Department of Health and Social Care

Termination of Pregnancy (Medical Defences) Act 1995: Feasibility of an Amendment Bill during the 2017/18 legislative session

This statement from the Isle of Man Government Department of Health and Social Care (equivalent to the Department of Health in England) summarises: the current position and that of other jurisdictions in the British Isles and Gibraltar; the evidence for clinical impact of termination of pregnancy on physical and mental health; the position of groups with a particular interest in abortion on the Isle of Man; the current review of the legal position in Ireland and the legal challenge to that in Northern Ireland; and indicators of demand for termination of pregnancy from Isle of Man women.

https://www.gov.im/media/1354907/termination-of-pregnancy-medical-defences-act-1995-feasibility-of-an-amendment-bill-during-the-2017-18-legislative-session.pdf

 

Scottish Abortion Care Providers Meeting – The Highlights!

Overview

The 7th Annual Scottish Abortion Care Providers meeting was held in Edinburgh on 27 January 2017.

Over 100 delegates attended from all over Europe, representing many different disciplines. It was a fantastic opportunity to meet enthusiastic colleagues and share new information and visions, helping to improve abortion care in Scotland, through talks, discussions and poster presentations. A wide range of thought-provoking topics were presented within the main meeting themes, including current care within Scotland, and the challenges and new initiatives associated with improving a women’s journey through abortion.

Scottish Abortion Care

Dr Rachael Wood from National Services Scotland opened the proceedings by providing some background to the current abortion statistics for Scotland. We learnt that there has been an increase of 2.6% in the number of abortions performed in Scotland from 2014 to 2015. This is not thought to be due to non-Scottish residents or women travelling for abortion. The increase has been seen mainly in women living in areas of deprivation, particularly women aged 35–39 years. Almost 80% undergo a medical abortion, with approximately 60% in 2015 occurring by 8 weeks (compared with 33% in 2006).

Difficulties in Abortion Care

Dr Caitriona Henchion from the Irish fpa (@IrishFPA) highlighted the difficulties faced by women and healthcare professionals in both the North and South of Ireland.

We then learned of Portugal’s journey following the legalisation of abortion from Dr Teresa Bombas.

Dr Lisa McDaid (@mcd_li) from the University of Glasgow provided an interesting insight into women’s experience of more than one abortion.1 She explained that there are often complex and overlapping issues, which demonstrate a range of potential vulnerabilities among women seeking more than one abortion. Terms such as ‘late’ and ‘repeat’ abortion are stigmatising in themselves for women. She suggested rather than a policy focus on trying to reduce ‘repeat’ and ‘late’ abortions, instead we should shift the focus towards preventing unintended conceptions and supporting those women who need subsequent abortions.

Latest Initiatives

Dr Philippe Faucher (@PhilFaucher) gave a stimulating talk on the management of early medical abortion (i.e. pregnancy of unknown location). He presented research to highlight that this is an option for many women and something that is now offered in his service in France. Provided risk factors for ectopic pregnancy are excluded, mifepristone can be administered, following a serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) result on that day. Women should be followed up within 7 days where an 80% decrease in serum hCG level would be expected (50% at Day 4).

Dr Faucher provided evidence to suggest that mifepristone was not dangerous for an ectopic pregnancy, which could well be missed on an early pregnancy scan. In fact, he proposed that managing abortion in this way would lead to earlier detection of ectopic pregnancies.

This is not yet routine practice in the UK. Currently high-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests are used rather than successive serum hCG levels to confirm complete abortion. However, this research suggests another option for women not wishing to delay their pregnancy management.

Dr Patricia Lohr (@lohrpa) shared bpas’ experiences when altering the timing between mifepristone and misoprostol from 24–48 hours to same-day administration. Both options were found to be acceptable to women. While there may be a slightly reduced efficacy with same-day administration, this was often the preferred option for women due to their own personal circumstances.

 Professor James Trussell presented reassuring work on the experiences of women seeking at-home medical abortion through ‘Women on Web’ from both Eire and Northern Ireland.2 Over a 5-year period (January 2010–December 2015) 5650 women requested at-home medical abortion. Just over 1000 women were surveyed, with 97% feeling they had made the right decision and 98% recommending the method to others. The feelings women most commonly reported after completing TOP were ‘relieved’ (70%) and ‘satisfied’ (36%).

We then heard about Scottish initiatives to improve women’s journey through abortion. Leanne Rockingham (@learock76) and Jill Wilson from NHS Lothian and Greater Glasgow and Clyde presented a recently developed animated film entitled ‘Let’s Talk About Abortion’ (https://youtu.be/KksPuM5cokc). This work led on from research carried out by the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships on young people’s views and knowledge about abortion. This short film addresses the gaps highlighted by the research findings and provides the information that young people themselves have asked for, in a format with which they will engage.

The meeting provided lots of food for thought, and prompted discussions and networking between groups to take some of these ideas forward. I’m looking forward to next year’s meeting already!

Janine Simpson, Specialty Registrar Community Sexual and Reproductive Health, Sandyford, Glasgow, UK; janine.simpson2@nhs.net

References

  1. Purcell C, Cameron S, Caird L, et al. Access to and experience of later abortion: accounts from women in Scotland. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014; 46: 101–108. DOI: 10.1363/46e1214.
  2. Aiken ARA, Gomperts R, Trussell J. Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population-based analysis. BJOG 2016; DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14401.

Norma McCorvey (1947–2017)

Jane Roe was the pseudonym for the plaintiff in the well-known Roe v Wade case1 which liberalised abortion law in the USA in 1973. The case turned on a woman’s constitutional right to privacy which had long been held to protect intimate and personal decisions from government interference. What is often not realised is that at no point in her life did ‘Jane Roe’ ever have an abortion. She was a woman lifted by chance into a national spotlight she never sought and tried to avoid for years. The real Jane Roe, Norma McCorvey, died on 18 February 2017 aged 69.

Norma was the ninth child of a poor family living in rural Louisiana. She was neglected by her parents and exhibited disturbed behaviour in childhood. Norma was made a ward of court and institutionalised. At 16 she had left school and was working as a waitress when she met and married a sheet-metal worker, Woody McCorvey. She suffered violence at his hands, before and after she became pregnant. She left him and gave birth to a daughter, Melissa, in 1965. She began drinking heavily and came out as a lesbian. She was deceived into signing adoption papers for Melissa by her mother; her mother raised Melissa.

At the age of 18, having been working in a series of mundane jobs, Norma had a second child whom she gave up for adoption. Norma was aged 22 and pregnant for the third time when in 1969 she sought an abortion, then illegal under Texan law except when necessary to save a woman’s life. After first claiming she had been gang-raped, thinking that this might get her a legal abortion, and seeking an illegal one as well, she visited the Dallas lawyers Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee. She was already 20 weeks’ pregnant. They wished to challenge the law which they knew would take time; McCorvey wanted an abortion urgently. She later claimed she had signed the affidavit without reading it and did not understanding what the case would entail. The case was filed against the Dallas County District Attorney, Henry Wade.

McCorvey’s baby had been born, given up for adoption and was 2½-years-old by the time the Supreme Court made its ruling. The decision, by a 7–2 majority, came on 22 January 1973. Justice Harry Blackmun’s opinion gave women the right to choose, while protecting the state’s interest in protecting the fetus in the later stages of pregnancy. Roe v Wade, and a companion ruling in a Georgia case, Doe v Bolton, nullified restrictive laws in 46 US states. The landmark decision marked a milestone in women’s reproductive rights.

Some years later, McCorvey stepped into the public eye, becoming a prominent voice for the pro-choice movement from the 1980s to the mid-1990s. Admitting in the media that her story of impregnation through gang rape was a lie (though that played no part in the case that went to court), she was pilloried by those on both the left and right. Working at a Dallas women’s clinic during a period when violence was not uncommon at abortion clinics, she was faced with verbal abuse from protesters daily.

McCorvey never managed to escape from poverty. She became increasingly embittered towards the feminist movement whose leaders were much wealthier and better educated than her. By the time her autobiography, I Am Roe, written with Andy Meisner, was published in 1994, McCorvey had become a born-again Christian. She was baptised by the head of Operation Rescue whose headquarters had moved to the same block as the clinic she worked at. She began campaigning vigorously against abortion, claiming she had been a pawn of her Roe v Wade lawyers. Later she converted to Catholicism.

Testifying before the Senate in 1998, she said “I am dedicated to spending the rest of my life undoing the law that bears my name”. She petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the Roe v Wade decision, but it rejected her appeal. She protested when Barack Obama spoke at the Roman Catholic University of Notre Dame in 2009, and was arrested at Senate hearings while protesting against the appointment of the pro-choice Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.

Sam Rowlands, Visiting Professor, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK

1 Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973).

BSACP 2017 Conference – Session/Lecture Suggestions Invited

31 March 2017

Dear BSACP Members

We are currently preparing the agenda for the next BSACP conference, which will be held on Wednesday 11 October 2017 at the Royal Society of Medicine in London.

We would like to invite members to contribute ideas for sessions/lectures, which will be combined with the list of suggestions made at the inaugural BSACP conference held in October 2015.

We welcome your views and suggestions, as we are keen to tailor the conference agenda to members’ requirements and interests.

Please submit your suggestions to the BSACP Administrator (admin@bsacp.org.uk) as soon as possible.

Please also remember to save the date – Wednesday 11 October 2017  – in your diary!

Welcome to the BSACP Website!

The British Society of Abortion Care Providers (BSACP) has been formed to promote best practice, education, training and research in abortion care.

The BSACP will serve its members by providing a forum for professional development and networking, as well as by raising the profile of the specialty and improving understanding amongst those responsible for abortion-related policy, guidance, commissioning, regulation and training.

BSACP Members’ Forum: DocMatter

BSACP members have access to a closed discussion group hosted by DocMatter. This is a forum for our community to share best practices in patient care, learn from one another, and collaborate.

New BSACP members will receive a welcome e-mail directly from DocMatter with a link to join, but if you have not received this, please click here to log in or sign up. Remember to use an institutional e-mail address if you are requesting access.

If have already set your password, you will be able to find the discussion group, here: https://www.docmatter.com/bsacp

If you have any questions, you can contact our Support Manager, Katherine Bruce, at: katherine@docmatter.com